Less is Less: Essay Rubric for LTWR's Student Writing Assessment Project

This rubric, adapted from the CSU English Placement Test (EPT) Scoring Guide, was created by Mary Wardell and Silverio Haro.  The CSUSM Essay Rubric evaluates writing with five larger categories in mind:

  • command of topic
  • argumentative development
  • organization
  • syntactic variety and language
  • control of mechanics

CSUSM's General Education Writing (GEW)  program has been using the CSU EPT Scoring Guide and the adaptation of it below since the writing program began in 1995.  GEW instructors use the rubric in their courses.  This same rubric is used to evaluate all of the GEW student portfolios (including those of  multilingual writers) at the close of each semester.  When evaluators apply this rubric to texts written by multilingual writers, they make one addition to the rubric by asking: Do the language errors impede meaning?  A "yes" answer will influence, at a minimum, the "Control of  Mechanics" score.  The scores for the other four areas may also be affected.

To apply this rubric to writing, note that each texts is evaluated in five categories on a scale of 1-5.  In each category, check the appropriate score.   In the "Total Points" box, insert the respective score for each category and add up the points.  

In our repeated use of this rubric in the GEW course, we have learned that instructors and students alike are especially appreciative of the way this rubric helps to demystify the evaluation process.  Cheers to your success with this rubric!

Essay Rubric

A. Command of Topic

 

5 Essay addresses the assignment, demonstrating both familiarity with pertinent critical issues and independent thought.

 

4 Essay addresses the assignment, both topic and strategies.

 

3 Subject is clear—although essay misses some element of assigned topic and/or strategies.

 

2 Subject is generally clear but not in keeping with assigned topic and/or strategies.

 

1 Essay is not in keeping with assigned topic and/or strategies.

 

B. Argumentative Development

 

5 Essay shows especially careful development of related ideas in coherent, sequential paragraphs.

 

4 Essay shows careful development of related ideas in coherent, sequential paragraphs.

 

3 Sequence of ideas is traceable—although paragraphing and structure are faulty.

 

2 Essay relies on unrelated generalizations, vague argument, uncertain information.

 

1 Essay is not coherent, showing little development of or relationship among ideas.

 

C. Organization

 

5 Student has edited the essay, ensuring that sentences are forceful and clear and logical.

 

4 While the student has edited the essay, some tangential ideas, unassimilated quotations, needless summary, and organizational flaws remain.

 

3 Incomplete editing is evident in excess (summary, unassimilated ideas and accessory information) and absence (support, transitions, flow).

 

2 Faulty editing shows in flawed sequence of ideas.

 

1 Student has neglected to edit the paper for content or paragraph construction.

 

D. Syntactic Variety and Language

 

5 Student has edited the essay, ensuring that sentences are forceful and clear and logical, avoiding gratuitous abstraction, tortuously convoluted sentences and purple passages.

 

4 While the student has edited the language of the essay, moderate stylistic and formal flaws and inappropriate usages remain.

 

3 Incomplete editing is evident in moderate stylistic weaknesses.

 

2 Faulty editing shows in serious stylistic weaknesses.

 

1 The essay is stylistically inappropriate.

 

E. Control of Mechanics

 

5 Essay is generally free from errors in word choice and mechanics.

 

4 Essay may have a few errors in word choice and mechanics.

 

3 Essay has an accumulation of errors in word choice and mechanics.

 

2 Essay is marred by numerous errors in word choice and mechanics.

 

1 Essay has serious and persistent errors in word choice and mechanics.

 

 

TOTAL POINTS

 
Area A, Topic  
Area B, Argumentative. Development  
Area C, Organization  
Area D, Syntax  
Area E, Mechanics  
Total Points /25 pts

Significant Features of the Writing:

METHODOLOGY

TIMELINE

HOME

RESULTS

E-MAIL FORMO

E-MAIL CESMAT