Salon #8: This is the only Salon #8 and it is for all SOC311 students. There will be no separate sections as we are too close to the end of the term.
We will focus here solely on Arthur Schlesinger Jr.s' "The Disuniting of America."
Each of you should respond to this salon by Thursday, Dec. 10th. Unfortunately there will not be time this term to have you react to other student comments.
If you are wondering about the hate mail addresses, I will include a list with the Paper #3 assignment which will be out on Monday, Dec. 6th and one of the questions for Paper #3 will involve using them.
Mini-lecture for Salon #8:
Schlesinger's book is an "essay" about his reactions to the emphasis on multiculturalism and the new form of "group identity politics" which emerged in the late 1980s and 1990s.
He poses an argument that this focus on ethnic groups (and other "groups" such as women) is pulling America apart and is an attack on the common culture of the United States. Let's go through his argument. In the first chapter, he emphasizes how those who emigrated to the United States became members of a "new race," namely Americans. He gives lots of examples from those who wrote about America, especially Alexis de Tocqueville, the famous French thinker who visited the United States before the Civil War and wrote his famous study of this country: Democracy in America, in 1835. Tocqueville noted the special characteristics of American culture and stated that immigrants became part of American society by taking an interest by participating in the governing of it. Iin other words, by exercising their political rights, as had been defined in the American Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, immigrants became Americans.
Schlesinger spends quite a bit of time discussing Israel Zangwill's play, The Melting-Pot which coined the term, the melting-pot, to refer to the mixing of cultures that occurred (successfully) in America. This concept of America as a melting-pot was considered to be favorable, though clearly there were some Americans (such as the Know-Nothing party in the 19th Century, the Ku Klux Klan, etc.) who were very much against the sense that America should become an ethnic "stew," and who favored those with Anglo-Saxon white (male) ethnic origins.
Chapter 2 looks at the role that history has played in the forming of ethnic and national identities. As Schlesinger states: "American history was long written in the interests of white Anglo-Saxon Protestant males" (p.53). However he argues that such men were dominant in the early history of the US and there was a complication in that American male WASPS were often anti-British (Anglophobes). He then goes on to show how history both incorporated and ignored various ethnic groups. By the late 1980s, the pluralistic range of American ethnic groups (and gender) began to have a major impact on the writing of history and the curriculum of schools. Chapter 3 is dedicated to a discussion of how the battle in the schools has been waged.
Now we want to get all the terminology straight. I have referred earlier to "identity politics" as the most generic term for describing the ethnic group efforts to make the group rather than the individual (or the generic American) the central focus. More euphemistically, this has often been called multiculturalism, which is a very general, broad-reaching term which emphasizes the sense that there are multiple cultural roots, traditions, values in a single society. "Political correctness" refers to support of identity politics. In the chapter on the "Decomposition of America," Schlesinger refers to "ethnic rage," "Afrocentricity," "racial and ethnic pride," "deculturalization," "cultural orientation," "separatism," "bilingualism," "diversity education." You need to be clear on what these various terms are and that Schlesinger is not hostile towards different ethnic identities, but is fearful about what Teddy Roosevelt pointed out: that letting national groups get into a tangle of squabbling over the various virtues and importance of their ethnic identities could "ruin" the American nation.
This is the basic focus of Chapter 5: here Schlesinger tries to air both the fears of minority ethnic groups, the likely demographic changes in ethnic group sizes, and how "the assault on the Western tradition" (the challenge to Western Civilization as a required college course, the opposition to a "canon" of great authors which students should be familiar, etc.) has failed to recognize how far the Western traditions themselves have been the foundations of free thinking and open-mindedness which allowed the issue of ethnic diversity to flourish. As the author states, the challenge to the United States is "how to restore the balance between unum (the unity and common values and purpose of the US) and pluribus" (the diversity, multiculturalism, ethnic identification and roots, etc.) of the American people.
You have two questions for Salon #8:
(1) Summarize Schlesinger's argument in one short paragraph (no more than 3 sentences).
(2) Now take Schlesinger's argument and think about what it means in relation to equality and inequality. Your task here is to relate it to the message on equality and inequality in each of the readings and films we have read and seen this term. Write one sentence relating Schlesinger's thesis (argument) to the central message on equality and inequality in the Declaration of Independence, Beloved, The Culture of Inequality, Death of a Salesman, When Work Disappears, and Lonestar. This will also serve as a good review for the final paper.
Answer these two questions in Salon #8 by Thursday, Dec. 10th.
Enter your comments below (Don't forget to submit):
To view others' comments in this salon, scroll down this page.
[Soc311--Inequality Home Page] [Return to Salon Menu] [CSU, San Marcos Sociology On-Line Courses] [CSU, San Marcos Sociology Homepage]Salon #8 Responses